江户初期汉诗人对于《沧浪诗话》的拒斥——以石川丈山《诗法正义》为例
祁晓明
摘要：就比较诗学而言，研究中国诗论在东亚传播过程中如何被拒斥，较之关注其怎样被接受，无疑更具有意义。石川丈山《诗法正义》对于《沧浪诗话》的去取，反映出江户初期汉诗人共同的诗学取向。尽管丈山引用沧浪诗论颇多，然其《诗法正义》与《沧浪诗话》之间却存在着根本性的差异，这说明沧浪诗论在江户初期的传播，曾遭遇到坚守朱子学文学观及江西诗派诗学立场的汉诗人的抵制。同时也表明，来自异域的文学新思潮在向接受国传播的过程中，除了受到本土文学的排斥之外，来自同一母国的先期输入的文学思想，也会构成传播的障碍。
in the Early Edo Period: Taking Correct Meaning of Poetic Rules by Ishikawa Jozan for Example
Qi Xiaoming
Abstract: In the field of comparative poetics, it is undoubtedly more significant to analyse how the Chinese poetic theories were rejected while spreading in East Asia than to concern how they were accepted. Ishikawa Jozan’s option of Canglang’s Notes on Poets and Poetry in Correct Meaning of Poetic Rules just reflected the common poetic approach of the Chinese poets in the early Edo period. Although Jozan cited much of Canglang’s poetic theory, there was fundamental difference between the two books, indicating that the spread of Canglang’s poetic theory in the early Edo period had encountered resistance from the Chinese poets who stuck to the literary stand of Zhu Xi or the Jiangxi poetic school. Meanwhile, it showed that besides the rejection by native literature, the literary thought being earlier introduced in could also form a barrier in the process of a foreign literary trend spreading to the receiving country.
