首页 > 原站 > 全文通览 > 文章摘要 > 《文史哲》2014年第5期摘要 > 正文

《文史哲》2014年第5期摘要

墨家“十论”是否代表墨翟的思想?——早期子书中的“十论”标语

日期: 2014-12-03 浏览:

墨家“十论”是否代表墨翟的思想?——早期子书中的“十论”标语

                       

[比利时]戴卡琳

摘要:现今的中国哲学史教科书几乎都以“十论”来介绍墨子的思想,即尚贤、尚同、兼爱、非攻、节用、节葬、天志、明鬼、非乐、非命。通过详细阅读并对照《墨子》与其他早期子书,可以得出与此不同的结论:一、“十论”或许不是墨子思想的最初产物,而是在《墨子》编写过程中逐渐形成的;二、周汉诸子在谈论墨家学说时,并非总是一致地以“十论”描述墨学,通常只提“十论”中的某几条标语。更值得注意的是,尽管唐宋以后的儒者与当代学者常以“兼爱”为墨子核心的主张,但早期诸子(除孟子以外)并不都认为“兼爱”是专属于特定思想家或学派的理论。如果我们留意古今学者在对墨家的认识方面所存在的差异,或许会重新思考我们对墨学先入为主的看法,并对早期墨学的面貌有不同的认识。

 

 

Do the Ten Mohist Theses Represent Mozi’s Thought? Reading the Masters with a Focus on Mottos  

                     

Carine Defoort

Abstract: In order to introduce Mozi’s thought, almost every contemporary textbook on Chinese philosophy refers to his ten novel theses or dogmas, which have been preserved as the titles of the Core Chapters (chs. 8-37): to elevate the worthy, to conform upward, to care for all, to condemn military aggression, to moderate expenses as well as burials, to acknowledge the will of Heaven and the percipient ghosts, and to condemn music as well as fatalism. Through a close reading of the Mozi and other early sources written by or attributed to masters, this paper argues, first, that these ten core ideas may not have been promoted by the earliest spokesmen of Mohism but gradually emerged while various layers of the book Mozi were written, and, second, that these ten ideas were not consistently attributed to early Mohism by Zhou and Han masters: their association of Mo with these specific mottos is limited and inconsistent. A focus on the most well-known motto--“care for all”--shows that there was no awareness of its exclusive belonging to one thinker or school. The difference between the earliest and the contemporary characterizations of Mozi do not only shed new light on early Mohism, but also on our preconceptions when reading early sources.