《刘子》作者综考释疑——兼论《刘子》的学术史意义
林其锬
摘要：“《刘子》刘勰著”，南宋以前直接可见的公私著录均无疑义；分歧始自南宋出现的《刘子》袁孝政注本及刘克庄引文。考证表明，袁孝政注本乃宋人伪托，刘克庄引文亦无的据；无论外证还是内证，都充分证明《刘子》著作权当属刘勰。辨别《刘子》作者归属，深入研究《刘子》，对全面认识刘勰、深入研究《文心雕龙》，乃至建构中华文化新体系，都具有重要的学术价值和实际意义。
A Comprehensive Research to Disabuse the Doubt on the Author of Liu Zi: with the Discussion of the Significance of Liu Zi in Academic History
Lin Qitan
Abstract:The opinion that “Liu Zi is written by Liu Xie” had been of no doubt in the visible official or private writings before the Southern Song Dynasty, but the divergence began from the annotated edition by Yuan Xiaozheng and quotation by Liu Kezhuang of Liu Zi emerged in the Southern Song Dynasty. Through the textual research, we can know that the annotated edition by Yuan is a pseudograph by the Song people, and there is no conclusive evidence of the quotation by Liu Kezhuang either. That is to say, both internal and external evidences fully prove that the copyright of Liu Zi belong to Liu Xie. For the comprehensive understanding of Liu Xie, the deep studies of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, and even the construction of new system of Chinese culture, it is of great academic value and actual significance to distinguish the authorship identification, as well as make intensive studies of Liu Zi.
