“侯景之乱”几则史料辨析
杜志强
摘要:萧绎“都督中外诸军事”之职是梁武帝密诏任命,而非朱熹《资治通鉴纲目》所谓之“自命”。萧纪称帝及发兵东下的时间,曹道衡、沈玉成二先生虽有考证,然亦有未密。萧纪的僭越行为主要是素心所致,而不仅仅是受萧圆照之蛊惑。萧恪让郢州刺史于萧纶,而非萧纶逼夺,萧纶自命“都督中外诸军事”,埋下了与萧绎决裂的祸因。记录侯景之乱的《淮海乱离志》作者为萧圆肃,非萧大圜或萧世怡。立场倾向的不同,是导致相关各史歧异互现甚至抵牾的重要原因。
Discrimination of Some Historical Materials on Hou Jing’s Rebellion
Du Zhiqiang
Xiao Yi, the seventh son of the Emperor Wudi of Liang, was appointed by his father to command the military at home and abroad in secret, but not appointed by himself based on The Outline of History as a Mirror written by Zhuxi. The time when Xiao Yi’s little brother Xiao Ji proclaimed that he was the emperor and sent his troops to the east is confirmed by Cao Daoheng and Shen Yucheng, but it is still not rigorous. Xiao Ji’s arrogation behavior is caused mainly by his real intention, and not just bewitched by his eldest son Xiao Yuanzhao. Xiao Ke, Xiao Yi’ younger male cousin, let his position as the prefectural governor of Ying Zhou to Xiao Lun who is the sixth son of the Emperor Wudi. Therefore, Xiao Lun regarded himself as the military commander at home and abroad, which set the curse to break with Xiao Yi. Xiao Ji’s son Xiao Yuansu, not Xiao Dayuan or Xiao Shiyi, recorded Hou Jing’s rebellion in his Record of the Huaihai Discord (Huaihai Luanli Zhi). The tendency of different position is an important cause of inconsistency and even mutual contradictory among the related groups.