首页 > 原站 > 全文通览 > 文章摘要 > 《文史哲》2015年第1期摘要 > 正文

《文史哲》2015年第1期摘要

文学史的限度、挑战与理想——兼论作为学术增长点的“民国文学史”

日期: 2016-04-25 浏览:

文学史的限度、挑战与理想——兼论作为学术增长点的“民国文学史”                               贾振勇

近年来“重写文学史”波澜再兴。我们的文学史编撰在积累了丰厚经验的同时,遇到了难以克服的瓶颈,实际存在的学术障碍和诸多热点问题的探讨,比如西方理论的“话语牢笼”现象、国民教育与意识形态的影响等,既凸显了“重写”行为的混乱与无序,又蕴含着创新的可能性与可行性。“民国文学史”是一个具有重大学术增值空间、富有包容性的开放性观念平台,凸显了尊重文学历史真实性、多维价值体系和历史发展的正义原则。当前的文学研究、文学史编撰,存在着过于偏离文学研究本身、学科内部分工过于细化、艺术和美学使命弱化、学术伦理意识薄弱等问题。只有回归“文学”基点,围绕发现、选择和品评杰作,统筹协调各项研究职能,才有可能实现“印证心灵,传承不朽”的学术使命。

 

The Limitation, Challenge, and Ideal of the History of Literature: with the Discussion of the “Literary History of the Republic” as Academic Area of Growth        Jia Zhenyong

   The trend of “rewriting the history of literature” waves again in recent years. There have been rich experiences gained in the writing of literary history in China, but at the same time, the academia is faced with some insurmountable bottlenecks. The academic obstacles and discussions on many hot issues, such as the phenomenon of “linguistic trap” in Western theories, and the influence of national education and ideology, not only reflect the chaos and disorder in the “rewriting” acts, but also contain the possibility or feasibility of innovation. The “literary history of the Republic” is an open and inclusive platform with high academic value, where the justice principle of respecting the authenticity of literary history, the multidimensional value systems, and historical development would be highlighted. In contemporary literary studies and compilation of literary history, there exist the problems of deviating from the literary study itself, too refined internal division within the discipline, reduction in artistic and aesthetic mission, and weak sense of academic ethics. Only if we return to the origin of “literature”, and coordinating kinds of research functions around discovering, choosing, and judging excellent works, the academic mission of “confirming the mind, and inheriting the immortal” could likely be realized.